client login
Username
Remember Me
Forgot Password
Password
CATEGORIES
 
Local Media Blog [ 979 ]  RSS ATOM


Blog Home

Contact Kelsey

Bookmark this page



SEARCH
 


previous month  MARCH 2006  next month
s m t w t f s
4
18
19
26 29


BLOG ARCHIVE
 
RSS ATOM  Full archive
 
current month



RECENT ENTRIES
 
 
RSS ATOM


BLOGGERS
 
admin [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Carlotta Mast [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Charles Laughlin [ 117 ]  RSS ATOM
Greg Sterling [ 750 ]  RSS ATOM
John Kelsey [ 61 ]  RSS ATOM
Matt Booth [ 5 ]  RSS ATOM
Mike Boland [ 136 ]  RSS ATOM
Neal Polachek [ 33 ]  RSS ATOM
The Kelsey Group [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM


COUNTER
 
Visitors    701394
Online users 22
 



Feb 27 2006
Printable version  |  Email to a friend
More on Google Click-to-Call
The New York Times has an interesting piece today on Google's click-to-call offering, and that of smaller companies such as eStara and Ingenio, that have offered pay-per-phone-call marketing products (the ad model built around the underlying click-to-call technology) for some time. What Google currently offers is not PPCall (it's not charging for it yet), but it is rather testing the click-to-call functionality on which a PPCall advertising model will be based - likely integrated with AdWords. We blogged about this two weeks ago, and wrote about it in the current issue of Local Media Journal.

PPCall as an ad model is attractive because of the large segment of SMEs that don't have a Web site, and those that prefer calls to clicks.

From the NYT article:

About 70 percent of those businesses do not have Web sites, so pay-per-click advertising makes no sense for them. But even those who do have sites often lack the sophistication or the time to manage a pay-per-click campaign, which can require considerable tweaking to outbid competitors without spending too much.

Pay-per-call advertisers must still manage campaigns, but the approach appears so effective that for many it is worth the effort. Judson Brady, the owner of Broad Street Flowers, an Atlanta-based floral service, said he paid Yahoo about $1.25 for each prospect who clicked on his search page advertisement, and 5 percent of those prospects ordered.

By contrast, Mr. Brady said he paid Ingenio around $4.15 for each call from a prospect � most of whom see the ads on AOL, which introduced its pay-per-call service last year. More than a third of the callers place an order. "We're lucky to break even on the pay-per-clicks, but with pay-per-call we'll make $25 profit per order," he said. "My only complaint is there's not more of it."


Google's entrance to the click-to-call world will vastly accelerate the adoption curve of the technology among SMEs as the company's reach, influence and brand recognition will help spread the message that pay-per-call marketing can be an attractive option for some businesses, as outlined above.

More importantly the tool will allow Google to tap into the segment of SMEs that don't advertise with AdWords, or don't even have a Web site (thus not being sold on the value of clicks). Combine this with Google's strategy to drive small business Web site development through its new free Web development and hosting service, and it becomes clear that Google is attempting to penetrate much further into local and SME markets.

It will be interesting to see how well it pulls this off.
 
Local Media Blog
posted by  Mike Boland at  18:15 | comments [2] | trackbacks [1]


BLOG COMMENT


posted by   Observer Feb 27 2006 at 21:11
Perhaps Google can apply the click-to-call offering to online classified websites whereby people that post ads get to use the service for free and the users that view the ads and click on the click-to-call icon view a textual/video ad for 5 seconds, or so, before being connected to the seller. The textual/video ad could even be relevant to the classified ad of interest to the user. Yet another venue for Google advertising... Google, please consider this idea!!!
 




posted by   Dick Larkin - YP Commando News  [ http://ypcommando ] Feb 27 2006 at 23:48


Driving this progress is the obvious desire to deliver higher quality leads to advertisers.

What's a "click" anyway? It certainly isn't a customer.

The dilemma most print YP publishers face now is how deeply and how fervently to promote this new advertising vehicle to their clients.

If they get in bed with Google and heavily promote this service to their best advertisers (the movers, contractors and PI attorneys), it won't be long before SOMEBODY does the math, and figures out that the good old double-truck in print just ain't what she used to be.

Right now, we're seeing a trickle of advertisers playing with this new service as an incremental advertising spend.

However, as PPCall distribution and adoption gains momentum, that trickle will become a torrent.

It reminds me of running a small town clothing store in the early 1980s when Wal-Mart moved into the area.

We didn't compete with the same merchandise, but they kept vacuuming dollars out of the market. Within a few years, our stores that had been around for 107 years called it quits.

This is going to be a bloodbath for the traditional media that don't adapt.
 




ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

html code

ubb code

max characters : 2000

+
- +
-
characters remaining :
remember me :
 
 
 



The Kelsey Group, 600 Executive Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540-1528
Tel: (609) 921-7200 Fax: (609) 921-2112 EMail: [email protected]
Copyright© 2005 The Kelsey Group. All Rights Reserved.