client login
Username
Remember Me
Forgot Password
Password
CATEGORIES
 
Local Media Blog [ 980 ]  RSS ATOM


Blog Home

Contact Kelsey

Bookmark this page



SEARCH
 


previous month  MARCH 2006  next month
s m t w t f s
4
18
19
26 29


BLOG ARCHIVE
 
RSS ATOM  Full archive
 
current month



RECENT ENTRIES
 
 
RSS ATOM


BLOGGERS
 
admin [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Carlotta Mast [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Charles Laughlin [ 117 ]  RSS ATOM
Greg Sterling [ 750 ]  RSS ATOM
John Kelsey [ 61 ]  RSS ATOM
Matt Booth [ 5 ]  RSS ATOM
Mike Boland [ 137 ]  RSS ATOM
Neal Polachek [ 33 ]  RSS ATOM
The Kelsey Group [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM


COUNTER
 
Visitors    701507
Online users 24
 



Feb 1 2006
Printable version  |  Email to a friend
Google Is Human
OK, not exactly. But yesterday's financial results showed the company was subject to the same pressures, market trends and unreasonable expectations that have confronted other Internet bellwethers such as Yahoo! and eBay.

I had expected Google to beat expectations. But the key word here is "expectations." If you look at what the company actually did, the results were impressive. Google revenues were $1.92 billion vs. $1.57 billion last quarter (22 percent growth, up from 14 percent vs. Q2). So revenue growth has accelerated.

These are very solid figures. They're just not mind boggling compared with Google's history of triple-digit revenue growth.

Google investors are a tough crowd � 86 percent growth (vs. last year) wasn't good enough. Admittedly, Google itself has conditioned expectations and set the bar pretty high with its past performance. But it's as if investors are saying the equivalent of "we expect a 100-point game every time" (to use a basketball analogy).

That's just not possible.

There are plenty of reasons to believe that Google's future performance will continue to be very strong. The company has consumer market-share leadership, which should continue for the immediate future at least. And, according to this MediaPost article (reg. req'd) citing an advertiser survey, marketers perceive greater value in Google advertising than in that of its main rivals:

About 71 percent of respondents said that search ads on Google were effective, compared to 62 percent who considered search ads on Yahoo effective and 49 percent who thought MSN search ads were effective.


In addition, WebSideStory asserts that search marketing produces double the conversions of other types of online marketing. Conversion here is defined as the percentage of visitors who click on a search result and go on to make a purchase or conduct a transaction of some sort. That percentage was 2.3 percent. (For every 100 consumers, 2.3 went on to spend money.)

So search can be expected to continue to attract marketing dollars. And it's still very much an "immature" medium; we estimate there are only about 475,000 to 500,000 such advertisers across the globe.

Moreover, the Internet is not going away. While there are challenges to growth on the advertiser side (bringing in more small businesses and so on) consumers show no signs of abandoning the Internet or search engines any time soon.

All these factors point to continued strong performance though perhaps not at the triple-digit levels of the past.

Google set up its bifurcated stock structure to partly insulate itself against the "whims" of the marketplace. (And it doesn't provide guidance for analysts.) That "insulation" isn't entirely working, as the company clearly feels the pressure to perform and explain why it didn't do better than expected.

That pressure should accelerate Google's efforts to diversify some of its revenues and roll out more new consumer and advertiser offerings this year.

Effectively, that means no letup in competition among the major brands (Google, Yahoo!, MSN, AOL), which, as one VC recently put it to me, "are in a feature war," and no rest for those of us who cover them.

____________

More analysis from Andrew Goodman at Traffick and extensive information and analysis from The Internet Stock Blog.

Here's Om Malik's Business 2.0 piece.
 
Local Media Blog
posted by  Greg Sterling at  08:08 | comments [3] | trackbacks [0]


BLOG COMMENT


posted by   Donna Feb 1 2006 at 13:10
The 2% search ad conversion rate's similarity to traditional direct response media conversion rates (direct mail, telemarketing...) is striking and does not appear to reflect a revolutionary accountability that the new medium claims its "pay per click" billing system provides.
 




posted by   Paris Hilton  [ http://parishiltonsex.tblog.com/ ] Feb 16 2006 at 02:31
Sexy Paris Hilton nude.<a href="http://parishiltonsex.tblog.com/">paris hilton nude</a>pics you can't find any where, see her sexy pics, video, paris hilton sex tape and lot more at <a href="http://parishiltonsex.tblog.com/">parishiltonsex.tblog.com</a>
 




posted by   Paris Hilton nude  [ http://nude-parishilton-sex.airmode.de/ ] Feb 16 2006 at 02:54
Paris Hilton nude pictures featuring <a href="http://nude-parishilton-sex.airmode.de�>Paris Hilton nude</a>galleries of exclusively uncensored clips of sexy celeb of Paris Hilton.<a href="http://nude-parishilton-sex.airmode.de/">nude-parishilton-sex.airmode.de</a>
 




ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

html code

ubb code

max characters : 2000

+
- +
-
characters remaining :
remember me :
 
 
 



The Kelsey Group, 600 Executive Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540-1528
Tel: (609) 921-7200 Fax: (609) 921-2112 EMail: [email protected]
Copyright© 2005 The Kelsey Group. All Rights Reserved.