client login
Username
Remember Me
Forgot Password
Password
CATEGORIES
 
Local Media Blog [ 912 ]  RSS ATOM


Blog Home

Contact Kelsey

Bookmark this page



SEARCH
 


previous month  MARCH 2006  next month
s m t w t f s
4
18
19
26
27 28 29 30 31


BLOG ARCHIVE
 
RSS ATOM  Full archive
 
current month



RECENT ENTRIES
 
 
RSS ATOM


BLOGGERS
 
admin [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Carlotta Mast [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Charles Laughlin [ 101 ]  RSS ATOM
Greg Sterling [ 748 ]  RSS ATOM
John Kelsey [ 53 ]  RSS ATOM
Matt Booth [ 0 ]  RSS ATOM
Mike Boland [ 83 ]  RSS ATOM
Neal Polachek [ 27 ]  RSS ATOM


COUNTER
 
Visitors    379784
Online users 164
 



Sep 1 2005
Printable version  |  Email to a friend
Which Search Engine is the Best?
No such luck. This was simply a Forbes.com headline designed to suck readers into a brief news story. Oh, and by the way, why don��t you respond to the question, ��What do you think is the best search engine?��

For the record, at 10:30 am EST on Thursday around 8,600 votes had been cast and the clear winner among respondents is Google with 69 percent. Yahoo is the only other company in double figures with 16 percent. Voting was the only way I could see the results, but I felt a little silly doing it. I really felt like a sucker when a multi-media ad popped up for Fisher Investments. Marketing is my background so Forbes gets a few points for getting me to play their game. However my business is analysis and both the headline and the results are deceptive. Asking which search engine is the best is a little bit like polling people about the best college. The results are meaningless. What concerns me is that Forbes is likely to publish the raw data without any analysis. That does a disservice to the search engine business and the media industry.
 
Local Media Blog
posted by  John Kelsey at  11:48 | comments [1] | trackbacks [0]


BLOG COMMENT


posted by   D Feb 4 2005 at 18:14
Forbes�� lazy and pandering ��Best Of�� approach does a disservice to more than the search engine business and the media industry. Offering a user poll under the guise of fact-finding journalism and bestowing a ��Best�� award perpetuates relativism, not sound reasoning. Such ��meaningless�� information will undoubtedly continue to be requested and reported because soliciting the public for the ��best�� stamp of approval provides publishers with free, user-generated content (Zagat, Citysearch��) and flatters users. Moreover, the typical user is oblivious to the ��meaningless�� quotient of such exercises.
 




ADD COMMENT
(*) indicates required fields
author (*) :
email address :
url :
 
  bold italic underline add hyperlink add email hyperlink centre unorder list order list add image quote emoticon smiles
 
comment (*) :

html code

ubb code

max characters : 2000

+
- +
-
characters remaining :
remember me :
 
 
 



The Kelsey Group, 600 Executive Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540-1528
Tel: (609) 921-7200 Fax: (609) 921-2112 EMail: [email protected]
Copyright© 2005 The Kelsey Group. All Rights Reserved.